<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It’s a Good Thing Natalie Gulbis is So Damn Good Looking…</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lastangryfan.com/2010/01/its-a-good-thing-natalie-gulbis-is-so-damn-good-looking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lastangryfan.com/2010/01/its-a-good-thing-natalie-gulbis-is-so-damn-good-looking/</link>
	<description>Sports humor for the socially awkward</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:26:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://lastangryfan.com/2010/01/its-a-good-thing-natalie-gulbis-is-so-damn-good-looking/comment-page-1/#comment-4368</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 16:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lastangryfan.com/?p=3425#comment-4368</guid>
		<description>subject nouns (I, he, she, we, etc) follow any for of to be, not object nouns (me, us, them, etc)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>subject nouns (I, he, she, we, etc) follow any for of to be, not object nouns (me, us, them, etc)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RT</title>
		<link>http://lastangryfan.com/2010/01/its-a-good-thing-natalie-gulbis-is-so-damn-good-looking/comment-page-1/#comment-3483</link>
		<dc:creator>RT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 01:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lastangryfan.com/?p=3425#comment-3483</guid>
		<description>Actually, &quot;me&quot; is correct, as in, &quot;This is  a picture of me at...&quot; adding Michele doesn&#039;t change that.
&quot;This is I at...&quot; is obviously wrong, as are you...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, &#8220;me&#8221; is correct, as in, &#8220;This is  a picture of me at&#8230;&#8221; adding Michele doesn&#8217;t change that.<br />
&#8220;This is I at&#8230;&#8221; is obviously wrong, as are you&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grammarian</title>
		<link>http://lastangryfan.com/2010/01/its-a-good-thing-natalie-gulbis-is-so-damn-good-looking/comment-page-1/#comment-3416</link>
		<dc:creator>Grammarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 20:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lastangryfan.com/?p=3425#comment-3416</guid>
		<description>Actually, &quot;Michelle and I&quot; is correct.  The sentence is a shortened version of &quot;This is Michelle and I ...&quot;.  Since &#039;Michelle and I&#039; are the object of a form of the verb &#039;to be&#039; the predicate nominative - nominative I instead of objective me - is correct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, &#8220;Michelle and I&#8221; is correct.  The sentence is a shortened version of &#8220;This is Michelle and I &#8230;&#8221;.  Since &#8216;Michelle and I&#8217; are the object of a form of the verb &#8216;to be&#8217; the predicate nominative &#8211; nominative I instead of objective me &#8211; is correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: willie</title>
		<link>http://lastangryfan.com/2010/01/its-a-good-thing-natalie-gulbis-is-so-damn-good-looking/comment-page-1/#comment-3304</link>
		<dc:creator>willie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 17:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lastangryfan.com/?p=3425#comment-3304</guid>
		<description>Good she has a t--t and can golf- otherwise she would be useless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good she has a t&#8211;t and can golf- otherwise she would be useless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deiter7</title>
		<link>http://lastangryfan.com/2010/01/its-a-good-thing-natalie-gulbis-is-so-damn-good-looking/comment-page-1/#comment-3302</link>
		<dc:creator>Deiter7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 15:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lastangryfan.com/?p=3425#comment-3302</guid>
		<description>C/mon you deeks...give her a break...technicall she is correct and as a matter of fact I am sure Mr Lincoln would be behind her as well....as well as me , myself and I would be right behind her, in front of her, over her , next to her...and even between her and Michelle Wie...man 6&#039; of asian coordination...that would be sweet....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>C/mon you deeks&#8230;give her a break&#8230;technicall she is correct and as a matter of fact I am sure Mr Lincoln would be behind her as well&#8230;.as well as me , myself and I would be right behind her, in front of her, over her , next to her&#8230;and even between her and Michelle Wie&#8230;man 6&#8242; of asian coordination&#8230;that would be sweet&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Berdell Hardy</title>
		<link>http://lastangryfan.com/2010/01/its-a-good-thing-natalie-gulbis-is-so-damn-good-looking/comment-page-1/#comment-3215</link>
		<dc:creator>Berdell Hardy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 16:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lastangryfan.com/?p=3425#comment-3215</guid>
		<description>Consider the source, although, &#039;technically, she is right. The Lincoln Memorial is behind her. So is the rest of the Country. Who knew?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Consider the source, although, &#8216;technically, she is right. The Lincoln Memorial is behind her. So is the rest of the Country. Who knew?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveP</title>
		<link>http://lastangryfan.com/2010/01/its-a-good-thing-natalie-gulbis-is-so-damn-good-looking/comment-page-1/#comment-2382</link>
		<dc:creator>SteveP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 21:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lastangryfan.com/?p=3425#comment-2382</guid>
		<description>Jake, when you want to wash your face do you sit on a toilet and flush?

LOL what tool you are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jake, when you want to wash your face do you sit on a toilet and flush?</p>
<p>LOL what tool you are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://lastangryfan.com/2010/01/its-a-good-thing-natalie-gulbis-is-so-damn-good-looking/comment-page-1/#comment-1768</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 19:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lastangryfan.com/?p=3425#comment-1768</guid>
		<description>She&#039;s still smarter than BH Obama, who wouldn&#039;t know his ass from a hole in the ground without his precious Teleprompter.

Not to mention that even Wie is better looking than his dude of a &quot;wife&quot;.

LOL!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She&#8217;s still smarter than BH Obama, who wouldn&#8217;t know his ass from a hole in the ground without his precious Teleprompter.</p>
<p>Not to mention that even Wie is better looking than his dude of a &#8220;wife&#8221;.</p>
<p>LOL!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael W</title>
		<link>http://lastangryfan.com/2010/01/its-a-good-thing-natalie-gulbis-is-so-damn-good-looking/comment-page-1/#comment-1049</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 16:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lastangryfan.com/?p=3425#comment-1049</guid>
		<description>When you&#039;re as hot as them WHO CARES!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you&#8217;re as hot as them WHO CARES!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://lastangryfan.com/2010/01/its-a-good-thing-natalie-gulbis-is-so-damn-good-looking/comment-page-1/#comment-1046</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lastangryfan.com/?p=3425#comment-1046</guid>
		<description>Eric,
Those are two different memorials/monuments. The one with the &quot;black dots&quot; is the Ulysses S. Grant Memorial at the base of Capitol Hill. It&#039;s just a few hundred yards away. The Washington Monument is much further in the distance. The two monuments are just lined up in the photo, so it makes them look like they are one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric,<br />
Those are two different memorials/monuments. The one with the &#8220;black dots&#8221; is the Ulysses S. Grant Memorial at the base of Capitol Hill. It&#8217;s just a few hundred yards away. The Washington Monument is much further in the distance. The two monuments are just lined up in the photo, so it makes them look like they are one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 7/22 queries in 0.009 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 390/404 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via cdn.lastangryfan.com

Served from: lastangryfan.com @ 2012-02-10 22:25:39 -->
